Use of robotic process automation by tax administrations and impact on human rights

Authors

Abstract

In recent years, there have been notable advances in robotic process automation (RPA), especially in cases of integration with commercial transactions in electronic markets. Tax administrations have gathered this experience at the forefront in assuming the new challenges of technologies. However, there are dark regulatory areas in the face of the large amount of data that a tax administration can access through an RPA, whose lack of regulation can violate human rights. This research, precisely, accounts for the problems that can arise from the use of RPA by tax administrations, especially in cases where this type of tool is integrated with artificial intelligence. In this line, the results of this work show that the main difficulties that could arise are related to the transparency of the tax administration acts and possible discriminatory acts in the application of RPA.

Keywords:

RPA, robots, tax, tax administrations, human rights.

Author Biographies

Antonio Faúndez-Ugalde, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

Doctor of Law from the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso. He is a lawyer and lecturer in tax law at the Business School of the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso.

Rafael Mellado-Silva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

Computer Engineer from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile). Master in Computer Engineering Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso (Chile). Professor of Information Systems at the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso (Chile)

References

Aguirre, Santiago and Alejandro Rodríguez (2017). “Automation of a Business Process Using Robotic Process Automation (RPA): A Case Study”. In Juan Carlos Figueroa-García, Eduyn López-Santana, José Luis Villa-Ramírez and Roberto Ferro-Escobar (editors), Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering, 742: 65-71. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7

Aldunate, Eduardo (2008). Derechos Fundamentales. Santiago: Thomson Reuters.

Arellano, Wilma (2019). “El derecho a la transparencia algorítmica en big data e inteligencia artificial”. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 50. Available at https://bit.ly/3Mwo0Z2.

Azuaje, Michelle and Daniel Finol (2020). “Transparencia algorítmica y la propiedad intelectual e industrial: tensiones y soluciones”. Revista la Propiedad Inmaterial, 30: 111-146. DOI: 10.18601/16571959.n30.05.

Barranco, María del Carmen (1996). El discurso de los derechos. Del problema terminológico al debate conceptual. Madrid: Dykinson.

Coglianese, Cary and David Lehr (2017). “Regulating by robot: administrative decision making in the machine-learning era”. Georgetown Law Journal, 105 (5): 1147-1223. Available at https://bit.ly/3qb8NVP.

Cotino, Lorenzo (2017). “Big data e inteligencia artificial. Una aproximación a su tratamiento jurídico desde los derechos fundamentales”. Dilemata, 24: 131-150. Available at https://bit.ly/3qaRgNr.

EDPS (2016). Dictamen del European Data Protection Supervisor, Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Available at https://bit.ly/45tuHna.

European Union (2020). “Getting the future right artificial intelligence and fundamental rights”. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at https://bit.ly/4211pt3.

Faúndez-Ugalde, Antonio, Rafael Mellado-Silva and Eduardo Aldunate-Lizana (2020). “Use of artificial intelligence by tax administrations: An analysis regarding taxpayers’ rights in Latin American countries”. Computer Law & Security Review, 38: 1-13.

Fung, Han Ping. (2014). “Criteria, use cases and effects of information technology process automation (ITPA)”. Advances in Robotics & Automation, 3: 1-11.

Gillis, Tim., Adrienne McStocker and Alec Percival (2015). “Indirect tax compliance in an era of big data”. Tax Planning International: Indirect Taxes, 13 (3): 1-6.

Hallikainen, Petri, Riita Bekkhus and Shan L. Pan (2018). “How OpusCapita used internal RPA capabilities to offer services to clients”. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17: 41-52.

Härd, Joakim and Max Svensson (2020). How Organizational Structures Affect the Implementation of Robotic Process Automation. A Practical Case Study. Tesis para el grado de MSc en Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de Lünd. Available at https://bit.ly/3MVbp1o

Harrast, Steven (2020). “Robotic process automation in accounting systems en Journal of Corporate”. Accounting and Finance, 31 (4): 209-213, DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22457.

Hofmann, Peter, Caroline Samp and Nils Urbach (2020). “Robotic process automation”. Electronic Markets, 30: 99-106. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00365-8.

Houy, Constantin, Maarten Hamberg and Peter Fettke (2019). “Robotic Process Automation in Public Administrations”. In Michael Räckers and others (Editors), Digitalisierung von Staat und Verwaltung (pp. 62-74). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik

IEEE Corporate Advisory Group (2017). “IEEE guide for terms and concepts in intelligent process automation”. IEE Std 2755-2017, 1-16. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.8070671.

IRPA, Institute for Robotic Process Automation (2015). Introduction to Robotic Process Automation. Available at https://t.ly/aY4zM.

Kirchmer, Mathias (2017). “Robotic Process Automation – Pragmatic Solution or Dangerous Illusion?”. BTOES Insights (Business Transformation and Operational Excellence Summit Insights). Available at https://t.ly/sVFob.

KPMG (2018). Transforming the tax function through technology. Available at https://t.ly/UgUFq.

Lacity, Mary and Leslie Willcocks (2016). “A new approach to automating services”. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58 (1): 41-49. Available at https://t.ly/Ltir.

Lacity, Mary, Leslie Willcocks and Andrew Craig (2015). “Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2”. The Outsourcing Unit Working Research Paper Series, 1-19. Available at https://bit.ly/43lLgzW.

Lazcoz, Guillermo and José Antonio Castillo (2020). “Valoración algorítmica ante los derechos humanos y el Reglamento General de Protección de Datos: el caso SyRI”. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología, 9 (1): 207-225. Available at https://t.ly/pQ_W.

Li, Jianjun, Xuan Wang and Yaping Wu (2020). “Can government improve tax compliance by adopting advanced information technology? Evidence from the Golden Tax Project III in China”. Economic Modelling, 93: 384-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.009.

Messacar, Derek (2017). “Big Tax Data and Economic Analysis: Effects of Personal Income Tax Reassessments and Delayed Tax Filing”. Canadian Public Policy, 43 (3): 261-283. DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2016-079.

Moffitt, Kevin, Andrea Rozario and Miklos Vasarhelyi (2018). “Robotic process automation for auditing”. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15 (1): 1-10. DOI: 10.2308/jeta-10589

Nolan, Deborah. (2001). “Los sistemas de información de apoyo a la fiscalización”. In Centro Interamericano de Administraciones Tributarias – CIAT (coord.), La función de fiscalización de la administración tributaria y el control de la evasión. Santiago: CIAT. Available at https://t.ly/88XF

O’Neill, Claire (2017). “Using digital delivery to enhance the integrity of tax systems”. In OECD (compilator), Tax administration 2017: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. París: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/tax_admin-2017-en

OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Technologies for better tax administration: A practical guide for revenue bodies. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264256439-en.

OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). Tax administration 2017: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. Paris: OCDE Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/tax_admin-2017-en.

OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). Tax Administration 2019: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/74d162b6-en.

Olivares, Bernardo. (2018). “Technological innovation within the Spanish tax administration and data subjects right to access: An opportunity knocks”. Computer Law & Security Review, 34 (3): 628-639. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.012

Osorio, Cristóbal and Leonardo Vilches (2020). Derecho administrativo. Conceptos y principios. Santiago: Ediciones DER.

Pérez, Antonio (2001). Derechos humanos, estado de derecho y constitución. Madrid: Tecnos.

Santos, Filipa, Rúben Pereira and José Vasconcelos (2019). “Toward robotic process automation implementation: an end-to-end perspective”. Business Process Management Journal, 26 (2): 405-420. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2018-0380

Syed, Rehan and others (2020). “Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges”. Computers in Industry, 115. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103162

UN, United Nations (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. A/74/493. Available at https://bit.ly/3qv7HnW.

van der Aalst, Wil M. P., Martin Bichler and Armin Heinzl (2018). “Robotic process automation”. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60 (4): 269-272. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4.

Vishnevsky, Valentine and Viktoriia Chekina (2018). “Robot vs. tax inspector or how the fourth industrial revolution will change the tax system: a review of problems and solutions”. Journal of Tax Reform, 4 (1): 6-26. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.1.042.

vom Brocke, Jan, Wolfgang Maaß, Peter Buxmann, Alexander Maedche, Jan Marco Leimeister and Günter Pecht (2018). “Future Work and Enterprise Systems”. Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE), 60 (4): 357-366.

Willcocks, Leslie, Mary Lacity and Andrew Craig (2015). “The IT function and robotic process automation”. The Outsourcing Unit Working Research Paper Series, 1-39.